Culture Dossier

Entries from April 2009

Ongoing/Upcoming Film Festivals

April 26, 2009 · Leave a Comment

 

For International films:

http://www.filmfestivals.com/index.shtml

 

Tribeca Film Festival

http://www.villagevoice.com/2009-04-22/film/tribeca-film-festival-2009-guide/

Atlanta Film festival

http://atlantafilmfestival.com/index.php

 Palm Springs Film Festival

http://www.psfilmfest.org/index.aspx

 

CANNES LINE-UP

 

The Cannes Line up is revealed
April 23, 2009

Opening Film in 3D Stereo: Peter DOCTER – UP – Out of Comp.- 1h35

Pedro ALMODÓVAR – LOS ABRAZOS ROTOS (Broken Embraces) – 2h09
Andrea ARNOLD – FISH TANK – 2h02
Jacques AUDIARD – UN PROPHÈTE – 2h35
Marco BELLOCCHIO – VINCERE – 2h08
Jane CAMPION – BRIGHT STAR – 2h00
Isabel COIXET – MAP OF THE SOUNDS OF TOKYO -1h44
Xavier GIANNOLI – A L’ORIGINE – 2h30
Michael HANEKE – DAS WEISSE BAND (The White Ribbon) – 2h24
Ang LEE – TAKING WOODSTOCK -1h50
Ken LOACH – LOOKING FOR ERIC – 1h59
LOU Ye – CHUN FENG CHEN ZUI DE YE WAN (Spring Fever) – 1h55
Brillante MENDOZA – KINATAY – 1h45
Gaspar NOE – ENTER THE VOID – 2h30
PARK Chan-Wook – BAK-JWI – (Thirst) – 2h13
Alain RESNAIS – LES HERBES FOLLES – 1h36
Elia SULEIMAN – THE TIME THAT REMAINS – 1h45
Quentin TARANTINO – INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS – 2h40
Johnnie TO – VENGEANCE – 1h48
TSAI Ming-liang – VISAGE (face)- 2h18
Lars VON TRIER – ANTICHRIST – 1h44

***
Closing Film : Jan KOUNEN – COCO CHANEL & IGOR STRAVINSKY – Out of Comp. – 2h00

UN CERTAIN REGARD

BONG Joon Ho – MOTHER – 2h10
Alain CAVALIER – IRENE -1h23
Lee DANIELS – PRECIOUS – 1h49
Denis DERCOURT – DEMAIN DES L’AUBE – 1h36
Heitor DHALIA – À DERIVA (Adrift)- 1h43
Bahman GHOBADI – KASI AZ GORBEHAYE IRANI KHABAR NADAREH (Nobody Knows About The Persian Cats)- 1h06
Ciro GUERRA – LOS VIAJES DEL VIENTO (Les Voyages Du Vent) – 1h57
Mia HANSEN-LOVE – LE PÈRE DE MES ENFANTS – 2h00
Hanno HÖFER, Razvan MARCULESCU, Cristian MUNGIU, Constantin POPESCU, Ioana URICARU:
AMINTIRI DIN EPOCA DE AUR (Tales from The Golden Age) – 2h18
Nikolay KHOMERIKI – SKAZKA PRO TEMNOTU (Tale In The Darkness)- 1h12
HIrokazu KORE-EDA – KUKI NINGYO (Air Doll)- 2h05
Yorgos LANTHIMOS – KYNODONTAS (Dogtooth) – 1h34
Pavel LOUNGUINE – TZAR (Le Tsar) – 1h56
Raya MARTIN – INDEPENDENCIA – (Independence) – 1h17
Corneliu PORUMBOIU – POLITIST, ADJECTIV (Policier, Adjectif) – 1h55
Pen-Ek RATANARUANG – NANG MAI (Nymph)- 1h49
João Pedro RODRIGUES – MORRER COMO UM HOMEM (Mourir Comme Un Homme) – 2h13
Haim TABAKMAN – EYES WIDE OPEN – 1er film -1h31
Warwick THORNTON – SAMSON AND DELILAH – 1er film – 1h41
Jean VAN DE VELDE – THE SILENT ARMY – 1h32

OUT OF COMPETITION:

Alejandro AMENABAR – AGORA – 2h08
Terry GILLIAM – THE IMAGINARIUM OF DOCTOR PARNASSUS – (L’imaginarium du Docteur Parnassus) – 2h02
Robert GUÉDIGUIAN – L’ARMÉE DU CRIME – 2h05

MIDNIGHT SREENINGS :

Stéphane AUBIER, Vincent PATAR – A TOWN CALLED PANIC (Panique au village) -1er film – 1h15
Sam RAIMI – DRAG ME TO HELL (Jusqu’en enfer) – 1h39
Marina de VAN – NE TE RETOURNE PAS – 1h50

The Telluride Film festival

http://telluridefilmfestival.org/

 

 

Los Angeles Film Festival

http://www.lafilmfest.com/

Categories: Uncategorized

The Dames Watch German Films

April 24, 2009 · 2 Comments

“The year was 1929, Germany was undivided, although the real Germany, its schools and other places pictured in the film were not German and reality failed to interest me.”
Josef von Sternberg

I have seen a few German films lately. I rented Blue Angel a few weeks ago and watched Goodbye Lenin and The Lives of Others. Here is a quickie as I have to go to sleep…don’t expect some logical  thread here…

Blue Angel (1930):

The story of the precipitous fall of a prominent professor to the life of a vagrant  after succumbing to the charms of Lola, a cabaret dancer played by the great Marlene Dietrich.

The plot takes place during the late 20s Weimer period and is said–despite the director‘s denial– to be an allegory for pre-war Germany. The story was based on Heinrich Mann’s “Professor Unrat”. Given Mann’s humanistic interests and his mission to satirize Germany’s imperial aspirations, it’s hard not to read/hear some subversive tones in this black-and white gem.
In Blue Angel, Dietrich’s overexposed body and  sexual energy pays tribute to old notion  that  a woman mystique  can sink ships and ruin civilizations.

Spellbound, the professor loses himself, his reputation , his identity, his manlihood.  He is cindered, completely decimated  by this lusty life force called Lola, man of letters-turned- bitter bag of shredded rags. Much like Dresden in 1945.

The film was outlawed in Germany and heavily edited in the United States.  

I read that director Josef von Sternberg was a fascinating character. Of Jewish ancestry, his family didn;t fit the norms of any social group. Von Sternberg is  certainly one of the most important and underrated filmmakers of our time. Several examine his take on women … and like his Austrian psychoanalyst buddy, he just flaps his arms in exasperation when confronted with the subject.  (For more on…. http://archive.sensesofcinema.com/contents/01/19/sternberg.html).
I rented it on Netflix.

What else…

The Lives of Others (2006) is a gorgeous film. Let’s start with the style… it’s a film that breathes naturally with its exuberant simplicity. We travel through the opaque colors of East Berlin under Communism. The film’s subtle sounds and minimal street movement contrast the busy sceneries of the fast-moving , capitalist West. Clean walls, few people passing by, less cars (I remember that in Vietnam… you could actually hear the birds, the wind…Lenin said much about the proletariat and their ear drums).

The story involves a Stasi agent who spies on writers and artists. As a result, he is enlightened by what he hears and sees and becomes subversive himself (ok, this is a real shortcut). Art, the film seems to tell you, is impermeable to ideological authoritarianism. It needs room to breathe. And it does, at the end of the film, with the debut of the protagonist’s play in the West. Ironically, the Stasi agent is often having to save the protagonist from being told on by his lover, East Germany’s theatrical star who is threatened and violated by a high official.

Interesting things I learned about this film:

+++First time director Henckel von Donnersmarck won the 2007 Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film. The film had earlier won seven Deutscher Filmpreis awards – including best film, best director, best screenplay, best actor, and best supporting actor – after having set a new record with 11 nominations. It was nominated for Best Foreign Language Film at the 64th Golden Globe Awards. The Lives of Others cost US$2 million[1] and grossed more than $77 million worldwide as of November 2007[update].[4] Prior to his death, Sydney Pollack was said to be directing a possible Hollywood remake of the film.
++The film was released in Germany on March 23, 2006. At the same time, the screenplay was published by Suhrkamp Verlag. Henckel von Donnersmarck and Ulrich Mühe were successfully sued for libel for an interview in which Mühe asserted that his former wife informed on him while they were East German citizens[1] through the six years of their marriage.[2] In the film’s publicity material, Henckel von Donnersmarck says that Mühe’s former wife denied the claims, although 254 pages’ worth of government records detailed her activities.[3] The film succeeded in Germany despite a widespread contemporary reluctance in the country, particularly in its films,[1] to confront the totalitarian excesses of the East German state.[2]

Goodbye Lenin

Hmmm… a decorative tour of East Germany’s vintage goodies filled with untranslatable German jokes? Ok, not too crazy about the film but don’t have the time or inclination to diss it. So, I’ll leave you with some real critics who have something to say about it. It was a bit cute to me, but I know I’m no fun.

New York Times:

A softhearted tribute to — of all things — Communism, ”Good Bye, Lenin!,” the German director Wolfgang Becker’s social satire, has a knobby tone that somewhat mutes its crowd-pleasing ambitions and keeps it from becoming ”My Big, Fat Life Is Beautiful.”

The film captures the struggle of the devoted Alex (Daniel Brühl) as he fights to keep up his mother’s failing health. In 1989, just before the fall of the German Democratic Republic, Christiane (Katrin Sass) sees her son beaten by police during a riot. She falls into a coma, and then the Berlin Wall — and all it stands for — collapses. ”Mother slept through the relentless triumph of capitalism,” Alex notes. Any sudden shock could kill Christiane, a committed woman of the left, so Alex contrives to keep her convinced that things are still the same.
Mr. Becker wryly uses Alex’s scramble to refit the apartment with castoff tacky Communist-era décor to tweak the heedless encroachment of capitalism. Alex has to rescue the pasteboard furniture that he and his sister, Ariane (Maria Simon), were happy to heave onto a junk heap. The furniture’s utilitarian design seems to inform us that East Berlin might have been where Ikea got its ideas from.
The opening-credit sequence, a flashback to Alex’s childhood, details his mother’s emotional fragility. His father runs off to frolic with, as Alex puts it, ”his enemy-of-the-state girlfriend.” Afterward Alex observes that his mother married the fatherland and ‘’since the relationship was not sexual, she had a lot of energy for us kids.” Part of Christiane’s commitment involves hurling herself into Communism.
And part of Alex’s commitment — keeping his mother in the dark — involves flinging himself into locating all of the horrible groceries Christiane craves when she regains consciousness eight months after the fall of the East German Communist regime. Neighbors shake their heads sadly after he’s caught digging through the garbage looking for empty jars with the original labels. We catch Mr. Becker and his co-screenwriter, Bernd Lichtenberg, rummaging through other stories, like Washington Irving’s ”Rip Van Winkle,” as well as Emir Kusturica’s ”Underground” (1995) and ”Situation Hopeless but Not Serious,” a 1965 comedy with Obi-Wan Kenobi, the Sundance Kid and Mannix (Alec Guinness, Robert Redford and Mike Connors). In ”Serious,” an old German doesn’t tell the American soldiers hiding in his basement that World War II has ended.
There are a few bright jokes and sharp observations in the sentimental ”Lenin!,” which opens today in New York and Los Angeles. Alex’s determination eventually pulls in everyone he knows; instead of paying off East German officials for better supplies, he’s now giving money to kids to dress as Young Pioneers — the left-thinking G.D.R. equivalent of Boy Scouts — to serenade his mother. Alex’s boyhood idol, a cosmonaut who now occupies a reduced station in life, becomes part of the imposture. And his best friend and fellow satellite television installer, who recuts wedding videos to match up with sequences from ”2001: A Space Odyssey,” recreates old-school newscasts.
The laughs grow out of the elaborate lies they have to construct when Christiane inadvertently glimpses the new world. ”My mother’s bedroom resounded with the melody of yesterday,” Alex says, and he and his pals become the kind of propagandists that disappeared when the Berlin Wall came down. It is not until the film’s denouement that the repercussions of the Communist regime’s campaign of disinformation aimed at the family adds a harsh, melodramatic tinge to the climax.
Alex’s efforts to surround his mother with a Potemkin village adds direction to his existence. ”Somehow my scheme took on a life of its own,” he says. One of the funniest scenes in the movie comes when Alex finds a way to make his mother’s dream come true. ”Our Trabant is here!” he announces, informing her of the arrival of the legendary Eastern European auto so shoddy in manufacture it could have had a wood-burning engine. ”And after only three years waiting,” Christiane responds, glee adding a tremble to her voice.
But despite their sting, the movie’s laughs don’t keep ”Lenin!” breathless enough. Although Mr. Becker can generate tension when necessary, he doesn’t flex that muscle enough. Despite his ability — and affinity — for recreating the physical details of the early 1990’s, ”Good Bye, Lenin!” is much too long. It starts to feel like a flabby, dramatic version of the first ”Austin Powers” movie, another exercise in living anachronism as a storytelling device. By the time the picture’s final note about German reunification is struck, ”Lenin!” has raised a wall of indifference for the audience.
”Good Bye, Lenin!” is rated R (Under 17 requires accompanying parent or adult guardian). It has Communist rioting and violence and post-Communist nudity, strong language and alcohol consumption.

GOOD BYE, LENIN!

Directed by Wolfgang Becker; written (in German, with English subtitles) by Bernd Lichtenberg and Mr. Becker; director of photography, Martin Kukula; edited by Katja De Bock and Andreas Schreitmüller; music by Yann Tiersen; produced by Stefan Arndt; released by Sony Pictures Classics. Running time: 118 minutes. This film is rated R.

WITH: Daniel Brühl (Alex), Katrin Sass (Christiane Kerner), Chulpan Khamatova (Lara), Maria Simon (Ariane), Florian Lukas (Denis) and Alexander Beyer (Rainer).

Categories: Uncategorized

Drew Barrymore–Grey Gardens

April 16, 2009 · Leave a Comment

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=103063394&ps=cprs

greygardens_200
In a film and TV career that started when she was just 3 years old, she’s played everything from one of Charlie’s Angels to Olive, the Other Reindeer. Now, Drew Barrymore takes on one of film’s legendary eccentrics: “Little Edie” Beale, a down-at-heel blue-blood made famous in the Maysles Brothers documentary Grey Gardens.

HBO’s new dramatization — based on the 1975 original, and premiering April 18 — co-stars Jessica Lange as Edith Ewing Bouvier Beale. “Big Edie,” as she was known, was the aunt of one Jacqueline Bouvier, who went on to marry a Kennedy, and then an Onassis. “Little Edie” was Jackie’s cousin — and sometime rival.

After their fortunes flagged — a divorce for Big Edie, an halting quest for fame as a model, or maybe as a wife, for Little Edie — the two women chose to seclude themselves in Big Edie’s East Hampton house, a dilapidated manse called Grey Gardens.

The Beales’ story gained attention when health inspectors raided the home, finding a long list of health- and building-code violations. It burst into the public consciousness again with the Maysles Brothers’ film, which documented the ladies’ living conditions: “The once-elegant grounds were a tangled jungle,” as The New York Times recalled on the occasion of Little Edie’s death; “25 rooms were unused, and the fleas were so thick that the filmmakers wore flea collars around their ankles during the filming.”

HBO’s dramatization, like the Broadway musical that was also inspired by the documentary, looks beyond the moment captured in the Maysles Brothers film, spanning more than four decades in the women’s lives and exploring how the Beales came to withdraw so completely from the world. The movie’s scope required both Barrymore and Lange to perform some scenes in heavy age makeup and prosthetics that took hours to apply.

Barrymore appeared in Steven Spielberg’s 1982 blockbuster E.T. when she was 7 years old. After a troubled adolescence, the actress has gone on to appear in many films including The Wedding Singer, Charlie’s Angels, Donnie Darko and 50 First Dates.

She makes her directorial debut later this year with Whip It!, a coming-of-age comedy based on the Shauna Cross novel Derby Girl.

Categories: Uncategorized

Midnight’s Children

April 11, 2009 · 3 Comments

Sir Salman Rushdie's novel Midnight's Children has been named the greatest Booker-prize winner of all time.

Sir Salman Rushdie's novel Midnight's Children has been named the greatest Booker-prize winner of all time.

“ [I think of] how astonished my younger self writing Midnight’s Children in the late-1970s would have been about this. It was written with such hope but not with the expectation that this book would still be interesting and relevant to people who were not even born when it was written.” Rushdie, 2008 Booker Prize Ward.

I (finally) just finished reading Salman Rushdie’s Midnight’s Children. I am a busy Mother/professional, not enough time to read all the great literature that is out there. But the need, the desire to read these stories is so strong, like a craving that never ends. Most of the time, I like to hear about what people are reading, seeing, experiencing in the arts, so I can take some of the knowledge and not feel like the life of ideas is wasting away in the mundane day-to-day life of a housewife in America. I digress. And I like my mundane life. Anyway… hope I don’t sound like I am inhaling too many cleaning products.
My impressions: Midnight’s Children is a huge book. It is dense yet delightfully entertaining, successfully ambitious. Genius, it reaches and attains the impossible: it tries to define India, its birth and its Indianess. Through the story of children with telepathic powers born at midnight on Independence day, Rushdie tells the history of this new, independent nation, a modern geographical invention of sorts, a linguistic quagmire, a nation of disparate cultures and languages, strung together as an ideal or an idea.
Saleem, the protagonist , like his new India, is fragmented as an individual, a million pieces put together as an invention. Empowered and yet imprisoned by his olfactory powers (he can smell concepts, colors, special relations, emotions); by his telepathic powers (he hears the voices of thousands of children with superpowers); by his relgion( a Muslim in a Hindu nation). Swapped at birth, he is raised by a family that is not his own, creating a domino effect of ironies and tragedies, much like the history of his beloved nation.
And through the intensity of the protagonists’ physical senses, Rushdie weaves the reader into great India and Pakistan. Retaining the idea of a national identity, this nation is enveloped in a complex, colorful web of of a mythological panoply, a melting pot as rich, savory and complex as the chutneys he creates. This is a book worthy of a dissertation, but it leaves a residue, a taste. I want this book to stay with me forever. And by the way, it’s a really funny book too.
Interesting facts about the book:
 Has been compared in its scope and execution to works such as James Joyce’s Ulysses, Günter Grass’s The Tin Drum and Laurence Sterne’s Tristram Shandy. Like them, Rushdie’s novel presents an encyclopaedic exploration of an entire society through the story of a single person. It is able to do this, in part, by merging with the novel form a number of non-Western texts such as the Sanskrit epics, The Ramayana, The Mahabharata and, most consciously One Thousand and One Nights.

++++The novel ran into some controversy for its open criticism of Indira Gandhi, India’s then prime minister, and the Emergency that she imposed on the country.

What knowledgeable people say…

In Midnight’s Children, the narrative comprises and compresses Indian cultural history. ‘Once upon a time,’ Saleem muses, ‘there were Radna and Krisna, and Rama and Sita, and Laila and Majnu; also (because we are not affected by the West) Romeo and Juliet, and Spencer Tracy and Katherine Hepburn’ (259). At this point Hutcheon’s post-modern perspective can be discerned: characters from Indian cultural history are chronologically intertwined with characters from Western culture, and the devices that they signify — Indian culture, religion and storytelling, Western drama and cinema — are presented in Rushdie’s text with post-colonial Indian history to examine both the effect of these indigenous and non-indigenous cultures on the Indian mind and in the light of Indian independence. It is in this sense, which blends with Loomba’s theory as quoted above, that Midnight’s Childrenis a post-colonial text, via its presentation and examination of the temporal and cultural status of India as an independent nation. This, as Edward W. Said writes, has been initiated in the text to portray the ‘conscious effort to enter into the discourse of Europe and the West, to mix with it, transform it, to make it acknowledge marginalized or suppressed or forgotten histories….[This] is of particular interest in Rushdie’s work’ (260).

Categories: Uncategorized

Salman Rushdie-Film on Satanic The Verses Affair -watch online

April 2, 2009 · 1 Comment

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00j6bnt

Twenty years ago, novelist Salman Rushdie was a wanted man with a million pound bounty on his head. His novel, The Satanic Verses, had sparked riots across the Muslim world. The ailing religious leader of Iran, the Ayatollah Khomeini, had invoked a little-known religious opinion – a fatwa – and effectively sentenced Rushdie to death. Never before had a novel created an international diplomatic crisis on such a scale, and never before had a foreign Government publicly called for the killing of a private citizen of another country.

This film looks back on the extraordinary events which followed the publication of the book and the ten year campaign to get the fatwa lifted. Interviews with Rushdie’s friends and family and testimony from leaders of Britain’s Muslim community and the Government reveal the inside story of the affair. Rushdie himself was forced into hiding for nearly ten years. Arguably this was the moment when religious identities, in Britain and abroad, became more important than ethnic and cultural belonging.

Broadcasts
Sat 7 Mar 200921:00BBC TwoMon 30 Mar 200900:40BBC One (except Northern Ireland, Wales)Wed 1 Apr 200900:20BBC One (Northern Ireland only)

Categories: Uncategorized